When it comes to Liberty, what is Liberty?
Liberty is the state of being Free. Where does this Liberty come from? Liberty comes from nature. It is natural to be free. It is unnatural to be a subject or slave. If you take away government, and take all laws off the books, you are then free to live your life however you choose. This single fact alone, is proof that our rights are natural and do not come from government. Now, I am not advocating for no laws and no government at all in saying this, I am only making a point as to where our liberties come from. Now when it does come to laws and government, our Founding Fathers envisioned a nation that would PROTECT these natural rights. The role of our Constitutional Government, is the common defense of the union, justice and general welfare of the people. What they mean by general welfare, is the ability to live peaceful and free lives. Any government act or law that imposes on our natural right to defend ourselves, or our right to live our lives as we see fit, is a direct violation of our natural rights. Laws should only be in place to establish justice if someone else is to harm you, not to protect you from yourself. This is why I stand firm as a Constitutionalist. Government is a necessary evil, however, this evil needs to be contained within very tight rules against itself, and We The People need to hold this evil accountable. Only when our government adheres to our Constitution, will we live as free men and free women. Section II is a much longer part to cover, and will need to be broken down by clauses within.
Section II: Section II Clause I: "The House of Representatives shall be composed of Members chosen every second Year by the People of the several States, and the Electors in each State shall have Qualifications requisite for Electors of the most numerous Branch of the State Legislature." In Clause I, it establishes how the House of Representatives are to be chosen/elected to office. This is another very straight forward part of our Constitution that clarifies exactly how our elective body is to be appointed. Section II Clause II: "No Person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained the Age of twenty-five Years, and has been seven Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen." Clause II sets some very specific requirements as to what makes you eligible to run for office and be elected as a member of the House of Representatives. You must be at least 25 years old, a citizen of the United States for at least 7 years, and you must be a resident of the State in which you are running for office. Section II Clause III: “[Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.]* Before I continue with Clause III, it is important to note the original wording within Clause III before being Amended after the Civil War. In this section of Clause III, many of our founding fathers were very against slavery. However, in this half of Clause III, they are merely trying to decide how to properly represent the People in the House of Representatives. George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison and George Mason all agonized over means to abolish slavery, however they had to keep slavery within the Constitution in order to get slave owners to agree to to ratify the Constitution. I will not be able to do the topic of slavery justice however on this piece, and will cover the topic much more extensively once I am on Article I Section IX. If you would like to see more on our founder’s opinions on slavery sooner, I recommend looking up George Mason, Federalist Papers 54 & 45, as well as Anti-Federalist Papers Brutus III. Continuing with Clause III: "The actual enumeration shall be made within thee Years after the first Meeting of Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such a Manner as they shall by Law direct. The number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty Thousand, but each State shall have at least one Representative; and until such enumeration shall be made, the State of New Hampshire shall be entitled to chuse three, Massachusetts eight, Rhode-Island and Providence Plantations one, Connecticut five, New-York 6, New Jersey four, Pennsylvania eight, Delaware one, Maryland six, Virginia 10, North Carolina five, South Carolina five, and Georgia three." In this half of Clause III, it lays out the structure for representation with how many representatives can represent the people of each state, the rules of a Census among the nation to draw out the structure of representation, and finally it lays in place the number of representatives for each State based on their current populations. Section II, Clause IV: "When vacancies happen in the Representation from any State, the Executive Authority thereof shall issue Writs of election to fill such Vacancies." In more simple terms, this clause is saying that the Executive Authority, or, the Governor I should say, has the authority to call for a special election in order to fill any vacancy of office if they so choose. If for example an unexpected death takes place shortly after an official is elected to office, the Governor is likely to call a special election. If there is only 1 month remaining for that term of office, a special election is well, meaningless and would likely not be called. Section II, Clause V: "The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment." Here is a very interesting clause, as it starts to finally address what some of the powers of the specific branch of government has. The House gets to choose it's own Speaker based on their own elective vote, and other officers under the same elective appointment. A good example, is Trey Gowdy being the head of House Intelligence Committee and head of the House Oversight Committee, and formerly Paul Ryan, soon to be Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House. It is also important to note that only the House has the power of impeachment, which is to say that the representatives closest to We The People have the authority to impeach sitting officials. Another benefit of the House of Representatives having sole power for impeachment, is that they are the most numerous branch, and it would be much harder for unjust impeachments to occur. It's much harder to get a larger group of people to agree on something in majority unless it is an unquestionable offense. Article I, Section I: "All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives."
In Section I, it is about as simple part of a Constitution as you can ask for. It is saying that only the US Congress has legislative abilities at the Federal level. Neither the President, nor any other executive branch, nor the Judicial branch have any authority or power to legislate laws of the nation. This is important to note that this Section is only referencing the federal body of Congress and it’s legislative abilities. This is merely establishing who at the Federal Level is to have Legislative abilities. Constitutional Education:
US Constitution Preamble: "We The People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America" What I seek to get across in this post, is the intent of our Constitution and the founding of this nation. "We The People" what are "We The People"? We The People are everyone. All persons of these United States. "in Order to form a more perfect Union" What is the Union? The Union was of 13 independent States coming together, forming a Union of states. They sought a more perfect Union for the purpose of unity. What was this Union designed for? To establish justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity. So what is Justice? Justice the quality of being fair and reasonable. Our justice system was a system designed for equality, and to be fair and reasonable. Our Justice as defined in the judicial powers of Article 3, gave very limited authority to the judicial branch of the United States for the purpose of maintaining a free society. We The People were given the authority to keep the judicial branch in check through the Jury. However, that is a topic for another day. Domestic Tranquility: Domestic tranquility generally means peace at home. It can be meant with reference to family as well as states. Domestic Tranquility with regard to constitution is referred to peace among the states. The purpose of this was as simple as it comes. That we ought to live free and peaceful lives without government interference. Common Defense: The common defense, being one of the few powers granted to the federal authority, in order to secure and insure the peace and defense of all of the States of the Union. So that the smaller states would not be subject to larger states, or foreign threat. This common defense aspect of the Preamble, is essentially what one could call a "mutual defense pact" among nations. "Promote the general Welfare" First and foremost, it must be asked "What exactly is, the general Welfare?" In this terminology, it is seen as ensuring the safety, and prosperity of the people of the nation. That anyone would have the ability to live a prosperous life and live it safely. If you go forward to Article I Section 8, it is known as the Welfare Clause where it defines and limits exactly what the general Welfare encompasses. You could also read the Cod Fishery debates where James Madison fought against subsidizing on the grounds of "welfare". And finally, to secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity: Our Liberty, meaning freedom from tyranny is to be secured to ourselves, that it may not be forfeited or taken away by any means, and that all our future generations ought to also be secure in their Liberty and freedoms. _______________________ This single paragraph of our Constitution, the Preamble of it alone shows the intent of the Constitution. It is in my opinion still to this day, the single greatest document written by man. There is a reason why the US Constitution is the oldest Constitution in the World that is still in use to this day. If we returned to the Constitutional principles laid forth by our Founding Fathers, we would live as free men without our liberties being stripped away from us at every turn. We The People, as noted above, meaning all of us, must all hold our leaders accountable to the United States Constitution, no matter who they may be. |Jessie One of the greatest things our founding fathers warned us about, were factions and a 2 party system. Our founders were very concerned with and feared a nation be divided by countless factions seeking control over the government, and parties pitted against one another working merely against each other, instead of for the nation.
John Adams once said, “The two party system is “the greatest political evil under our constitution.” “There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the Republic into two great parties, each arranged under its leader, and concerting measures in opposition to each other.” George Washington also made a statement against factions during his farewell address. In Washington’s farewell address he said “The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism. The disorders and miseries, which result, gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual; and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of Public Liberty.” So what are factions? Factions aren’t just your typical Democrat v Republican parties. Factions include Conservatives, Liberals, Progressives, Antifa, KKK, or otherwise. Factions are any group of people that compete for their ideology. These factions compete for power, just to give themselves more power. What happens when your faction loses power? Your rights, your freedoms all begin to be violated by the new faction in power, that has been granted more authority than it should have under our Constitution. In Federalist Papers #9, Alexander Hamilton put a great contrast on our Constitutional Republic towards the old Republics of Greece and Rome. That division that the great factions within their republic caused, with assassinations, war, and otherwise plaguing their nations as they compete for power. He stated how it is impossible to look at these republics without horror and disgust with the distractions they continually agitated and revolutions to follow. He then went on to note that in all of these cases, these factions lead to despotism, rather than the liberty that these republics were originally designed for. During this explanation by Alexander Hamilton, he began to explain the importance of separating powers of government into their distinct branches in order to curtail the balance of power shifting too heavily towards a “ruling faction”. In Federalist Papers #10, Alexander Hamilton went on to note how in a well constructed Union, one of the strongest advantages, is the ability to break and control a violent faction. He described a faction as “By a faction, I understand a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or a minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adversed to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community. “ When you look at the United States today, it is clear that our Founding Fathers’ warning has gone unheard. We are a nation divided by 2 parties, and each party has numerous factions under it further dividing us. If we wish to regain this nation, we need unity, not division. We have to unite behind the Constitution, throw away party line politics, throw away the factions and restore the original intent of this nation so that we can live free from government overreach from either side. Some of the largest stigmatized issues we face in the United States are our laws, law enforcement, and justice system. In this Article, I will be discussing how Constitutional Integrity could solve all of these issues. Laws: When it comes to laws, we are facing quite honestly a Constitutional crisis. Article VI, Section II of our United States Constitution, states plain as day that all Federal Laws in pursuance of the Constitution, are Supreme Law of the land. It also states that any State Law or Constitution NOT with pursuance of the Federal Constitution, is notwithstanding. This means that all laws at both State and Federal level that are in direct contrast with the U.S. Constitution are null and void. States do not have the authority to infringe on our self-evident unalienable rights, nor supersede the bill of rights. This is put in place to protect We The People from all levels and branches of government that would seek to limit our abilities. Any gun control law, regulation, tax or otherwise, is in direct violation of our entire Constitution. No form of government can pass laws that violate the people's liberties. The 9th Amendment guarantees that all our natural rights are to be protected by this same measure, as the 9th states; "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." By simply returning to Constitutional Law, we regain all of our individual liberties, and will not be seeing people get fined, or jailed having done nothing to harm another individual. We would return to a "no victim, no crime" society. Law Enforcement: Our Law Enforcement Community is obviously vital for upholding the law and helping protect the people from injustices. However, there are a few issues to be addressed within this. First off, it must be established who is the supreme law enforcement of the land? That would be the Sheriff. The Sheriff has top jurisdiction in any case and must delegate authority to others on scene if anyone else is to attain jurisdiction. That means even the FBI for example, is subject to the jurisdiction of the Sheriff. Secondly, our officers are required to swear an oath of office to perform their duties in accordance to the law, and the Constitution. The vast majority of officers legitimately join the Law Enforcement Community with the intention of doing good for the community. This is an unquestionable fact. The problem, is that so many of these officers do not firmly know or understand the Constitution of the United States, let alone their own individual State Constitution. This is causing a huge problem within the Law Enforcement Community that has created an abundance of animosity among the civilian community, especially that of the Black American community. It is often seen as being institutionalized racism or other forms of transgressions against minorities through the police. When reality and statistics show that this is happening across the board. Everyone is being unjustly arrested and sentenced for crimes that quite frankly shouldn't be crimes. If you have harmed no person, stolen from no person, you are not guilty of any legitimate crime. Needless to say, if our Law Enforcement Community refused to uphold unjust laws, almost all of these issues would cease to exist within the Law Enforcement Community. The best way to start getting our Law Enforcement Community enforcing Constitutional Law, is getting Constitutional Sheriffs elected into their seats. This way, they could also keep in check every other law enforcement agency and protect We The People, by enforcing Constitutional Integrity from within. Justice: Almost our entire judicial structure has fallen away from Constitutional Integrity. As per Article III of the U.S. Constitution, and again the Supremacy Clause in Article VI Clause II, it is stated that all courts are to be Constitutional Courts. We are plagued with activist judges on both the left and the right which are both completely distorting the purpose and fabric of our Judicial system. There have also been many instances of judicial bias within the court system with Judges and prosecuting attorneys "making examples" out of people, or siding unquestionably with police officers that are in trial. One of the biggest problems within the justice system is the Supreme Court of the United States. Many cases that the Supreme Court rules on, are not even within the authority of the Supreme Court to rule upon, and in addition to that, they often rule based on opinion rather than the Constitution. This has laid the frame work for unconstitutional laws and regulations to be pushed across all levels of Government. The Supreme Court is NOT the supreme law of the land. It is up to the States and the people to nullify these inappropriate rulings. Sadly the Court system will be one of the hardest things to fix in our nation, as Judges are almost untouchable by We The People. It would take a lot of work to replace these corrupt judges and prosecuting attorneys with Constitutional minded individuals. Thankfully thiere is one way to effectively neutralize these Judicial activists on the bench. That is through the Jury. Through the Jury we can nullify all unconstitutional laws by rejecting prosecution of those who have done no wrong, and forcing the prosecution of those who have. That is what gives We The People the power to be represented in the Judicial system. While we work to achieve justice reform, we still have the ability to take matters into our own hands in the mean time. This too however would all come to an end if we had a system in place that properly enforced Constitutional Law rather than political activism from the Judge's seat. If they simply followed the Constitution, there would be no need for "activism" to begin with on the judicial side of things. |Jessie. As we look at the disarray that America is in, with vast amounts of division, debt, abuse, fighting, etc, what's the one thing missing in all of these factors?
Constitutional Integrity. Today, I'd like to talk about the simple right of business between one another. When operating a business, or even simply bartering with one another, you must each come to an agreement before exchanging of goods or money. Now let's say that I'm selling a television set and stereo system. If somebody wants to purchase only the television, must I be forced to sell them only the television? Or what if somebody I blatantly don't like wants to buy the television, because it's cheap? Am I forced to sell him the television? The answer to both of these questions is unequivocally NO, I am not forced to sell the items to anyone. Doing business or bartering with one another is a contracted agreement between both parties. In exchange for my services or products, you must give me what I seek, be it trade, or cash. Now in the sense of businesses like Starbucks, Christian Bakers, Hobby Lobby, Muslim or even Jewish diners, or otherwise. Can Starbucks constitutionally refuse service to gun owners? Most definitely. Until the purchase or trade has been executed, the product is THEIR property. As an example, if you go into Walmart, who's property are ALL the products of the building belonging to? They all belong to Walmart until you purchase them for yourselves. A Muslim Halal or Jewish Kosher business, cannot be forced to serve a product they do not wish to serve, and a Christian baker cannot be forced to serve an item they wish not to serve. It really doesn't even matter the reason behind a business or individual's decision not to provide their service, they withhold that right to refuse service. So what is it we are supposed to do if somebody refuses us service? Answer: Find somewhere else to take your business to. Why would you want to give somebody money that directly opposes your views anyways? Answer 2: If the market is rich for opportunity because options are minimal? Start your own business, as that means you have a good chance of success if you are an all-inclusive business individual. Even if you are opposing and restrict the opposite people, it means you get the other half of the market. |Jessie ”The Unexpected Light in New Jersey’s Governor’s Race.”
If the words “New Jersey Politics” bring to mind images of fat-cats smoking cigars in back rooms, Chris Christie sitting on a beach, or corruption, high taxes and liberal mess, you're not alone. In fact, New Jersey is leading the nation in the number of Millennials fleeing this out-of-control spending, liberty robbing, and wealth sapping state. Families and individuals who are just starting their careers are tired of the lies, the terrible business climate, and the taxes, and are voting with their feet. When they leave, the future of New Jersey gets dimmer. Those men and women could be creating jobs, building new factories, and engaging their communities to make things better. And they will be doing all these things. Just not in New Jersey. Matt Riccardi is one of those Millennials, but instead of leaving for greener pastures, Matt has decided that instead of moving, he is going to water the grass in Jersey, where he grew up... Even when the old fat-cats yell at him to get off the lawn. Riccardi is a Husband, Father, former US Marine, a former student of the Ivy League, and of Hofstra. After honorable discharge from the Marine Corps, Matt enrolled in the University of Pennsylvania. During these years, Matt was baptized as a Christian, and married his wife. When the time came, he chose to delay his higher education to raise his children, and took over his father's business while his family dealt with some struggles. While running the family business, Matt saw first hand the effect of high taxes and poor government leadership, as he watched home after home, and business after business sold and shuttered across New Jersey. The dreams of countless families were crushed by inept State and Federal government who couldn't lower taxes on the working and middle classes if their lives depended on it, but supported more tax cuts for the Fortune 500's who were buying these empty houses and shops. Matt grew tired, and then he grew angry, and his Marine hard-charging spirit drove him to do something most people would call crazy. Mr. Riccardi decided to run for public office as a Constitutionalist in order to stop the tide of red-tape, endless fees, and invention crushing high taxes. Matt decided that the future of New Jersey couldn't continue to be handed back and forth between two groups of swamp-rats. Putting his name, his time, and his shoe-leather on the line, Matt Riccardi has traveled the State of New Jersey dozens of times a month for the last year to bring his simple message to voters. His message; This isn’t about the party, or about the swamp-rats. This needs to be about putting New Jersey first by bringing Liberty, Integrity and Prosperity back to New Jersey. To insure this remains true, Matt has written a Notarized Contract declaring that if Matt should break any of his promises not to raise taxes, he himself will pay the Democrat and Republican parties of New Jersey $10,000. It's an unheard of idea, but it's so obvious it's amazing we haven't demanded it before. Political rats get elected all the time on words they never plan to keep, and yet We the voters fall for these promises over and over. Matt’s approach to maintain trust with the people, is to put himself on the line to produce Leadership through Integrity. Why should politicians regularly gain office on obvious broken promises and still face no personal penalty for breaking those promises? Matt's contract is there to prove his good will in his intents. If his actions in office should make you pay, with even a single broken promise, he pays, both in public shame, and in his young family's wealth. Further, since Matt is also going to donate his paycheck to any charity the people of New Jersey pick, this cost to a small family is no joke. Not only would he be giving up his good name, he would be giving up his own children's future. You can learn more about Matt Riccardi and his plans to put New Jersey first at www.r4nj.org/ on Facebook at Riccardi4NJ, and on Twitter @Riccardi4NJ. |Guest Writer: Alex Walson Both of these men are often revered as terrible figures in history, merely because of who they fought for. Sadly however, simply because of who they fought for, history puts two incredible figures with more honor and dignity than likely anyone you will ever meet to shame.
Erwin Rommel fought for Germany, not for Hitler. Not for the Nazis. He fought for his nation above all else. He was revered by Patton, Montgomery and other famed Allied Generals as a man of honor and integrity. His soldiers under him in the Wehrmacht saw him as a father figure. When higher ups questioned Hitler's sanity and plotted to assassinate him, Rommel was torn by his honor and integrity as to how to handle the invitation to the plot. Ultimately, he did not join the plot, but also did not report the plot. He could not morally betray his nation in any way, but also could not morally support the madman known as Adolf Hitler. When Adolf Hitler discovered Rommel knew of the plot and said nothing, he took Rommel's family hostage and ordered him to commit suicide before releasing his family. Rommel is a war hero for a bad side of a disgusting era in human history. One of the most honorable generals you can find in history. Robert E. Lee in contrast is a very similar character. His loyalty was to his state. He fought out of loyalty to the people he lived among his entire life. He fought for the freedom and right of states to govern themselves despite being adamantly against the secession as well as slavery. Robert E. Lee was also married to Marry Anna Custis Lee, George Washington's great granddaughter. Mrs. Lee was also adamantly against slavery, and broke the law in order to teach blacks how to read and write. Robert E. Lee was offered to be the leader for the Union's military. He declined the position, not wanting to see war break out. He was also offered to lead the South, which he again declined until his state of Virginia came under attack from the North. This is when General Lee took to the field and took command of the Southern forces. He was a man of loyalty who wanted to protect his home. After the war, General Lee was often rebuked by the South, shunned, and even seen as a traitor for agreeing to surrender to the Union. He was also picked as the ambassador from the South to help repair relations and bring the nation back together. The resentment in the South towards the Northern aggression was strong, and despite that General Lee worked diligently to repair the torn nation. He also was quoted numerous times praising the fact that slavery had come to an end in the South, and wanted to see a new era of prosperity within the Southern states. Many of Robert E. Lee's statues were not erected until long after the war, when the resentment had ended, and the people had been thankful for the service he did to protect their homes, and the continued service to bring the nation back together as a hole. This is also large in part why the U.S. Military recognizes the Confederate soldiers as U.S. Veterans, and why we even named a tank (M3 Lee) after General Lee. ____________________________________________________________________________________ At the time of the secession movement before the civil war, every state had a constitutional right to leave the union at any given time without even needing to state a reason technically. The Union was formed in a way similar to that of the European Union. It was a trade union and alliance to protect each other. However, with federal overreach, the states in the South came to the conclusion that the North is trying to grab too much power and therefore left the Union. Yes by the way, slavery was a huge issue on the table, but to say it was the sole or even primary issue at hand is a completely false. Each state was, and technically is its own nation as a part of a union of states. That was the intent of our founding and that is the way it should remain. Sadly after the Civil War, the concept of that was destroyed and the mudding of the education system of our nation has made people not even aware that it ever was that way. |Jessie. The 10th Amendment
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. This means that the Department of Education is unconstitutional. This means the Bureau of Land Management is unconstitutional. This means the Department of Energy is unconstitutional. This means the EPA is unconstitutional. The list goes on. Our Constitution was designed for the PEOPLE and the STATES to govern themselves. The only Constitutional Authority our federal government has, is to protect the States from threat, secure our borders, and budget. This budget by the way, is to be again within the bounds set forth by the Constitution. It is up to the States to fund the Government, not the Government to fund the States. This is so that the States retain their say and will not waste their own money on projects that benefit them in no way. If we as Americans are to protect and restore our Constitution, we must first understand our Constitution. It is time for the PEOPLE and the STATES to reclaim their Sovereignty to govern themselves without Federal infringement and overreach. This coming Tuesday is one of the most crucial elections we may ever face in America. We have a chance to protect and restore our Constitution, or lose everything our forefathers have fought for, and everything our soldiers have died for.
This Tuesday, we have to remember not only to vote Trump for president, but to vote Republican Senate and House candidates in to office. We absolutely cannot afford to lose the House or Senate in this election. Get out and vote! Everything is at stake in this election. Our Supreme Court is one of the most important things in this election. As much as it pains me to say this, we even need to vote for people like John McCain for their House and Senate seats. If we do not, we might lose the ever important Majority within the House and Senate. If the Democrats have majority, they can block anything and everything that Trump and/or the people seek to fix. So I'll say it again. Get out and VOTE! Straight Republican this ticket. In 2020, we can clean house with the corrupt Rhinos and finally set our country straight. If we do not win this election, even if Trump is everything we want him to be, it will be all for nothing if the Democrats steal the House or Senate. |Jessie. I am not a Republican.
I am a Constitutionalist. I am voting Republican. Why? Because I am a Constitutionalist, and nobody else holds even remotely close to the values of our Constitution, neither in action nor in word. Hillary Clinton is pro-TPP, Obamacare, gun control, Abortion, is an out right criminal, a liar, a thief, a murderer, supports rapists to further her career, a puppet to globalists and likely to start an all out war with Russia by following Obama's foreign policy that she herself has a FIRM hand in as Secretary of State. Gary Johnson I think is mentally challenged, as he seems to not even know what he himself says half the time. He is also pro-TPP, gun control, abortion, etc. He is NOT a Libertarian, but a fraud. Jill Stein is a Euro-Socialist. She's a member of the Green Party which runs along the same principles as the Green Party of Europe. This does not suit the US Constitution, nor does it suit our economy, nor does it suit the society. I refuse to vote for anyone or anything that is SURELY against the Constitution. I am voting for Trump because even though he may not be entirely trustworthy and a total jackass, he is the most likely out of the 4 candidates to uphold our Constitution. The other 3 have all PUBLICLY announce they want things that go against Constitutional values. Trump claims he wants to protect and restore Constitutional values. Even if that may be a lie, he is the ONLY one doing so. Therefore, I am voting Republican. END OF STORY. |Jessie. In the 1700s-1800s there were 3 basic ideologies within Europe. Liberal, Conservative, and Reactionary. Liberals wanted more freedoms and protections. Conservatives wanted status quo. Reactionaries wanted things to be returned to the way they used to be. These simple 3 ideologies were dominant throughout Europe, and realistically even within the United States but to a lesser degree. The United States during this time was mostly Liberal and Reactionary. Eventually these 3 ideologies branched out to extremes on each side of the spectrum. Fascism, Socialism, Anarchism, and Communism are primary examples of ideologies that spawned during this time period.
Now, to get to the point of this article, in the 1700s-1800s there was a Liberal movement. A strong Liberal movement that brought forward many positive things throughout Europe and abroad. This was known as “Liberal Agitation”. This Liberal Agitation was the voice of the people crying out for freedoms and protections such as right to vote, elimination of child labor, and equal representation among other things. Just as today, some reforms aren’t as good as people believed they would be, but that’s not the point. This Liberal Agitation was met with STRONG resistance from the political elite of the 1700s-1800s. They were suppressed in many ways. They were silenced, press was shut down or state controlled, police and military would silence the protestors and more. This led to the Liberal Agitation becoming even further angered, and cry out louder than ever. Nations were forced to either silence their people by force or give in to their demands. Each nation that tried to silence the people by force were met with armed revolution. Today, we face the same thing on the opposite side of the spectrum. People are waking up to see that the Liberalism is going too far. The Political Elite again try to silence the people by calling them Bigots, Racists, Misogynists, and otherwise to stamp out our voice. The Political Elite set up false flags, and counter protests in order to make it appear that we are in the wrong. We are now experiencing a Reactionary Agitation within The United States as well as Europe. This Reactionary Agitation is leading to a call for a Convention of the States, Texas Independence, and British, French, Greek and other independence reforms from the EU. The people want power restored to the people. If we let the Political Elite continue this political correctness garbage to silence our voices, we will lose our power. Our nations will all be destroyed from within. We need to wake up NOW, or else the only way to restore our nations will be the same way of the 1700s-1800s. If we can’t force our politicians to listen, we will only be able to take our nations back through ARMED revolution. |Jessie America, we are facing some incredibly crucial elections this cycle. We have either Hillary or Trump entering the White House after these elections. One, we know will destroy the country. One says he will fix the country, but we have no background to know if he truly will.
This makes our Senate elections all that much more crucial than they ever have been. Currently the Republicans/Conservatives hold Senate Majority by a very small margin. Sadly however, with polling data combined with nobody on the planet apparently paying attention to the Senate primaries, we are left with either poor candidates, or bad polling data in various battleground states. Based on current projections, unless we wake up, get out, and vote, the Republican Party will lose Senate Majority. Where we can still push for Constitutional candidates, we need to do so and NOW. Where we have no choice but to vote for a "moderate" Republican, we have to bite our tongue to hold the Majority in the Senate. Within this week, we will start rolling out Senate Candidate reviews on battleground candidates that we have to get behind. Please America, join us in order to protect America's Freedom and Liberty. Help us protect what's left of our Constitution. We absolutely cannot afford to lose Majority. Nothing will be accomplished, or everything will be destroyed. Help us spread word, help us get the vote out, help us protect our Constitution. Get out and vote. You can help simply by sharing this article and upcoming articles with information on our candidates. |Jessie. |